In Friday the 13 th part 6 Jason demonstrates that murdering children doesn’t interest him. Are his victim’s surrogates for his father? Is this a hyper-violent version of the Oedipal complex, exploring ideas relevant in the last half of the 20 th century like latch-key kids or the change in the traditional nuclear family? killing anybody from their teens onward) are an attempt to remove an obstacle to being with his mother. I’m by no means an expert when it comes to psychoanalysis or theorists like Freud, Jung, Zizek, or Lacan, but I have read a little and am familiar with a few theories. It’s implied in the first Friday the 13 th that Jason sees his mother’s beheading, providing the impetus for his kill-crazy rampage stretching across almost a dozen films by now. He needs his mother he needs her to guide him, protect him, and perform matriarchal functions. Jason is obviously still mentally adolescent, explaining the subservient posture – consenting to knell like a subject. She asks him to knell and it’s only when Jason spots his dead mother’s decapitated head behind the imposter that he strikes. Voorhees, attempting deception in order to escape his forest hideout. I remember in the second Friday the 13 th film the female lead (who incidentally kind of kicks Jason’s ass around a little) imitates Mrs. I started thinking about Jason and the Oedipal complex, wondering if there’s any validity to my thoughts.
#Is jason voorhees retarded movie#
Watching the film in 2-D makes the tricks even more silly and although I’ve never seen the movie in 3-D, I’m sure it’s a hoot (I know a 3-D version exists on DVD, but I’m not rushing out to pick it up). Originally the film was released in 3-D and the cheap gags are apparent – a spear, a yo-yo, eyeballs, all flying towards the camera. AMC is showing just about every Friday the 13 th movie this week tonight they’re on part 3 and 4 and I’m currently watching part 3.
0 kommentar(er)
